The 8 mistakes I see most in construction contracts

Take heed to the article
4 min

This audio is auto-generated. Please tell us when you have feedback.

Building disputes continue to rise in 2025. But the issues that set off these disputes normally boil right down to cost, adjustments, timelines or schedules and high quality of labor. 

Because of this how a contract is written issues. 

On building initiatives, the surprising normally happens. A correctly written contract can remove most of the potential areas of dispute by offering a roadmap to decision.  Though most building contracts are professionally written, a quantity nonetheless include gaps that open the door to disputes. 

By extra successfully addressing these gaps, stakeholders can cut back the variety of conflicts that emerge as a undertaking progresses. Whereas this isn’t authorized recommendation, our expertise and analysis has recognized eight of the most typical contract errors that result in disputes and litigation.  

1) An in depth course of for speaking and dealing with adjustments is missing.

Just about all initiatives expertise adjustments throughout their building.  Contracts ought to stipulate a proper course of for speaking, approving and making adjustments that’s adopted by all and permitted by all.  When that course of is correctly adopted, it’s simpler to trace the place and the way issues bought side-tracked.

2) The Pressure Majeure clause must be up to date.

Prior to now, Pressure Majeure clauses have been crafted to cowl catastrophic occasions, resembling floods and earthquakes, most of which have a comparatively low chance of occurring. The idea of Pressure Majeure has advanced to incorporate modern-day catastrophes, such because the pandemic, world provide chain interruptions, wars and different calamities. In fashionable building contracts, it can be crucial that Pressure Majeure clauses are revised to offer for immediately’s realities.

3) Venture scope shouldn’t be well-defined, or the wording is simply too basic.

For instance, as a substitute of writing “set up lighting,” the scope ought to embody an in depth description of the entire scope and steps for the lighting undertaking. Totally different folks perceive issues in another way. The most effective contracts allow all events to grasp the identical issues the identical means.

4) Timelines and deadlines are lacking or poorly outlined.

What defines completion, in addition to expectations for the time span wanted to finish the duties?  How does the contract determine who’s chargeable for slowdowns and delays? What are the results for lacking deadlines? With out correctly defining these facets, it turns into tough to find out the instigator, motion, diploma of disruption and penalty.

5) Definitions for cost are lacking or incomplete.

Specifics relating to what constitutes cost, completion, timeline for cost and even a course of for withholding cost ought to be detailed and agreed upon. 

6) Stakeholders use a one-size-fits-all contract.

Each undertaking is exclusive. Every options distinctive particulars, descriptions and timelines. Which means the contract must be distinctive too. One-size-fits-all contracts are typically overly basic with a view to accommodate a wider vary of initiatives. However that’s additionally why they’re extra prone to open the door to misunderstandings and disputes.

7) There’s no course of for dealing with and settling disputes.

When disputes come up, it may well save a whole lot of money and time to have an already agreed-upon course of for settling disputes that particulars negotiation, withholding cost, mediation, arbitration, litigation and different paths to decision.

8) The contract doesn’t assign threat and threat distribution.

Care ought to be taken to outline threat and determine who’s chargeable for delays, defects, interruptions, worth will increase and different elements.

Lastly, though it might appear apparent, it’s necessary that each one events signal the contract in addition to approve all adjustments and revisions. With out settlement signatures, contracts and adjustments will not be binding.

To scale back the variety of disputes, undertaking stakeholders should be proactive. Which means anticipating the problems that may come up, with a view to extra simply stop them beforehand or mitigate them after the very fact.  

As a substitute of ready till disputes occur, making use of a lens to every of those eight areas through the contract improvement course of might be fairly helpful. Anticipating disputes and agreeing to strategies for resolving them will go a great distance in the direction of stopping them, probably saving vital money and time.