California high-speed rail CEO has a plan to get the project back on track

Hearken to the article
6 min

This audio is auto-generated. Please tell us when you have feedback.

California’s undertaking to construct a high-speed rail line between San Francisco and Los Angeles, permitted by voters in 2008, has confronted delays, value overruns and political opposition from two Trump administrations and congressional Republicans. 

Moving into that quagmire, Ian Choudri was named chief government officer of the California Excessive-Pace Rail Authority in August 2024. No stranger to rail megaprojects, he’s labored with Bechtel Company, HNTB and different main contractors. He labored on the development of the Washington Metropolitan Space Transit Authority’s Dulles Airport line in Washington, D.C., and was a discipline engineer on the Channel Tunnel that hyperlinks southern England and northern France.

Now he’s tasked with discovering the cash to finish the California undertaking, assembly building deadlines and restoring the belief of politicians and the general public. Sensible Cities Dive spoke with Choudri in regards to the challenges the undertaking faces and the way he plans to beat them.

Editor’s word: This interview has been edited for size and readability.​​​​

SMART CITIES DIVE: What was your impression of the undertaking once you turned CEO in 2024?

IAN CHOUDRI: I used to be already conscious of a whole lot of the challenges this undertaking was having. One was organizational construction. The funding has been all the time the largest constraint to get something organized in the correct order. I additionally wished to take a look at the design standards that we have been utilizing to construct this high-speed rail, and so we needed to make enhancements in all these areas.

What did you do first?

I needed to rent your entire group on the prime from probably the most related industries. So, if there is a building chief, his total profession has been building earlier than and has been in rail building. [The] engineering chief is somebody who has labored on high-speed rail engineering and planning. 

My instruction to our management was to take a look at each alternative that might assist this undertaking to get additional streamlined in order that we are able to construct it as quick as we are able to.

We improved the design standards and introduced it consistent with European and Japanese high-speed rail system design requirements. We discovered a whole lot of alternatives to not overbuild, [and] that gave us the chance to relook at right-sizing the undertaking, which is how we optimized the price.

What compromises and selections within the August update report needed to be made to deliver the undertaking to fruition sooner and at a decrease value?

We checked out every thing: funding, financing, commercializing, monetizing, authorized challenges that we had and likewise return on funding. We needed to then put this plan ahead with optionalities in it.

[The state] legislature made the selection of what they wished to do for now. The selection was $1 billion [a year] for 20 years. There have been seven or eight different legislative actions that we requested for that may truly expedite the development, expedite fixing points and construct it a lot sooner. We’re going to return and have extra discussions in January, February 2026 and proceed to have a dialog. 

There’s a whole lot of appreciation of the problems on the legislature, and I’ve a whole lot of assist from [Gov. Gavin Newsom]’s group. They’re behind it. So, I am hoping that throughout the subsequent two, three months, we get this stuff transferring.

You’ve spoken about the potential for involving the non-public sector. What are you able to inform us about the place that stands?

We began our one-on-one discussions [in January] in confidence with totally different teams: financiers, concessionaires, banks and so forth. We launched requests for expression of curiosity from the trade of P3 (public-private partnership) teams, and we received 30 responses from 30 totally different entities. Six or seven are the most important buyers, concessionaires which have proven excessive curiosity. 

They have been ready for legislative motion. Now they know that the funding is there, so in November we’re going to be soliciting the P3 buyers, and we are going to [select] probably the most certified group by, I’d say, Could or June of subsequent yr. 

What different funding choices are you contemplating?

Think about a fiber connection, 5G broadband, totally different entities utilizing the [rail] hall that now could be owned by the state on a long-term concession foundation. We’re speaking to the hyperscalers — Google, Meta and different [cloud service providers] — in the event that they wish to make the most of this hall to place a fiber cable [that] can join their information facilities.